Gun control argument paper

History[ edit ] Calamity Janenotable pioneer frontierswoman and scout, at age The American hunting tradition comes from a time when the United States was an agrarian, subsistence nation where hunting was a profession for some, an auxiliary source of food for some settlers, and also a deterrence to animal predators. A connection between shooting skills and survival among rural American men was in many cases a necessity and a ' rite of passage ' for those entering manhood.

Gun control argument paper

The study examined 25 potential risk factors and six others related to gun ownership.

Gun control argument paper

Variable Adjusted Odds Ratio Illicit drug use 5. But, what is the absolute risk of this association? For a basic primer on absolute and relative risk, and why critical readers should be alert to the distinction, see www.

Over a forty year period that risk translates to between one-and-one-half hundredths Gun control argument paper three one-hundredths of 1 percent of homicide risk for each family member.

See Calculation Derivations below. These absolute risk estimates can be reduced further by Gun control argument paper more factors. Kellermann found gun homicide risk is 4. That lowers the absolute risk by 30 percent. The other factor is — "Gun ownership was most strongly associated with homicide at the hands of a family member or intimate acquaintance addjusted odds ratio, 7.

Guns were not significantly linked to an increased risk of homicide by acquaintances, unidentified intruders or strangers" p. Applying the above two factors lowers the annual risk range to.

Regardless, we can see the risk of a gun in the home being used to kill a resident in an arrest-free home is quite small. The data, such as it is, is available at http: A subsequent study, again by Kellermann, of fatal and non-fatal gunshot woundings, showed that only The risks are different.

Stated another way, murders in the home of victim residences are a subset of all murders. However, this number drops to Pat Baranello writes in a letter to the editor in the New England Journal of Medicine, "What the article failed to address is that gun ownership by responsible people is not a risk factor source.

Self-Defense Is A Basic Human Right: A Website That ENDS The Gun Control Debate For Good Comments 66 Read by 8, people A website is putting the final nails in the coffin of the gun control debate for good.
Guns and values United States soldier searching a civilian for handgun possession at a United Nations checkpoint in Bosnia.
Featured Post From The Archive: The impossibility of the police preventing endemic crime, or protecting every victim, has become tragically evident over the past quarter century.
10 Snapshots Of Gun Control In US History - Listverse I have a few merit badges. And it used to be like the AAA.

Mathematically speaking, logistic regression calculates only one co-efficient per risk factor which can be converted into an odds-ratio. If a gun in the hands of persons with criminal records or a history of violence are much more prone to commit homicide than unarmed persons without those risk factors, and the large majority of cases in a regression model had a history of violence and arrests, the odds-ratio is going to reflect the increased risk of a gun in the hands of a volatile group, rather than representing a risk factor for the general population.

For an example to the contrary, even though living alone was found to be riskier than owning a gun, examining the ICPSR dataset shows there were 46 matched-pair cases who lived alone and had no history of arrest or violent activity.

In this group, gunowners had a Further study would be necessary. Counting guns According to Gary Kleck"The observed gun-homicide association is so weak that it could easily be due entirely to a higher rate of concealing gun ownership among controls than among cases.

Aldine de Gruyter; Why should there be a higher rate of false denial among the controls?

ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY ON GUN CONTROL

As this law review article states: While the problem of unwillingness to admit gun ownership is not entirely absent as to the homicide case households, it is much less acute.

In cases where the murder weapon was left near the body the police report would presumably so indicate. In cases where it was not, the report would presumably indicate whether the home was searched for guns, whether other occupants, if any, were asked about gun ownership, and whether registration records were consulted to see if a gun was registered to a person living in the household.

The family of the deceased in the case-subject home also had time between the homicide and the interview to go through the effects of the deceased and to discover a gun, if one was owned. None of this, however, eliminates the possibility that a gun was kept in the homicide household.

That possibility is far better minimized as to the homicide case households than as to the control households.

Support This Site

Source Kellermann attempts to address this potential problem, of controls underreporting gun ownership, by citing a study conducted by him and others. However, another study, conducted in part due to "the small sample used in the Kellermann study," found that May-June v n3 p 7.

Among the residents of the high-crime areas from which the case-control samples were drawn, the denial level would almost certainly be higher. Unaccounted confounders Kleck believes the 2. In turn, gang members are 19 times more likely, and drug dealers at least six times more likely to be homicide victims.

These risk factors would easily be large enough to create a spurious odds ratio Another source cites a paper finding "gang members are 60 times more likely than members of the general population to die through homicide.

Auditablitly For roughly four years Kellermann refused to honor requests from legitimate scholars to examine his data, prompting law professor Daniel Polsby to comment that it was seriously debatable whether "the Kellermann results should be credited at all, because the data on which their work rests was neither deposited with the New England Journal nor otherwise made available to independent researchers" Firearms Costs, Firearms Benefits and the Limits of Knowledgep.

Two things are notable about the data. Second, I would have been able to determine whether all of the pieces of information gathered by K.The question of gun rights is a political question, in the broad sense that it touches on the distribution of power in a polity.

Thus, although it incorporates all these perfectly legitimate “sub-political” activities, it is not fundamentally about hunting, or collecting, or target practice; it is about empowering the citizen relative to the state.

Feb 19,  · The country’s financial giants hold more sway over the gun industry than any politician. If banks and credit card companies were to stop doing business with gun . Why should gun owners concern themselves with the United Nations? After all, what jurisdiction do U.N.

bureaucrats have for sticking their nose into the U.S. gun control debate since the United States Constitution gives no authority of any kind to the U.N?

A website is putting the final nails in the coffin of the gun control debate for good. If you've ever been on the fence about whether or not you think guns should or should not be regulated, look no further.

Dec 08,  · Gun control has been an increasingly debated topic both within the United States and among other countries that are watching. For many of those countries. The question of gun rights is a political question, in the broad sense that it touches on the distribution of power in a polity.

Thus, although it incorporates all these perfectly legitimate “sub-political” activities, it is not fundamentally about hunting, or collecting, or target practice; it is about empowering the citizen relative to the state.

Gun politics in the United States - Wikipedia